The fact that plural and double chords are used only with a given class of subjects seems to indicate a conclusion. Human subjects are designed as agents that may be involved in a common action to a particular degree. PR, especially in the particular marked resolution, represented by the double verb coinciding with two singular subjects, is another way of presenting this form of mutual participation. 2) For the verb “to be” irregular, different formations are used, but a -s is always used for the singular third person 1) For a single person (he/she) in the contemporary form, the verb must have an end: the lack of interest of the scholars of the GA for the subject is in flagrant contradiction with the attention that linguists give to the same phenomenon in other modern languages. Despite the amount of information to be read in the grammatical grammars of the GA (see in particular Kohner and Gerth 1898: 77-82), much remains to be known, even at a general descriptive level. What is the distribution of the different patterns? Can one of them be considered a rule, with a number of possible exceptions? Or is the situation different and more fluid? In the general corpus as in sample B, a close conjunction agreement (i.e. the situation in which it is the subjects closest to the verb and which trigger the agreement) predominates. By checking the records, we found only two cases where the AP is triggered by the farthest subject. They are reported in the exx. 8 (a case of gold-coodinate) and 9.21 The theme of this sentence is the singular “one,” not the plural “dogs.” This means that the verb should also be singular.
To correct this type of error, take a look at the sentence to identify the subject. Both are close to the value of 2 per p < 0.001 with df 1 (10.87); the contribution of cells for and the co-ordinated (0.48 and 0.50, respectively, for singular and non-intstrest chords) is considerably lower. Here is a group of three people: Sarah, Ella and Cleo. This means that it is plural, and it requires a plural like "are". It`s easy to mix because the last no bite in the list is unique, but the subject is really the three girls. To correct this error, you need to be especially careful when you see a list that contains the theme of the sentence. In this sense, research in comparative Indo-European grammar has called into question the existence of a systematic agreement (in Corbett`s words) in the reconstituted proto-European. According to Meillet and Vendryes (1953: 598-600), the semantic value of the number was expressed independently by the morphology of subjects and verbs. Gradually, a more restrictive and systematic covariance emerged, the strict syntactic rules of the subject-verb agreement imposing.
Nevertheless, the prehistoric situation is attested by the many types of so-called ad sensum agreements that survive in ancient texts.7 From this perspective, the verb, regardless of its syntactic trigger, can still retain semantic force: spokespeople can use a plural form to emphasize the plurality of agents who join their efforts, while the singularity may result from the fact that two coordinated concepts are actually designed as two sides of a single concept (see